ERP-agnostic architecture
NetSuite, Microsoft, SAP, Zoho, Xentral and adjacent systems are used where they have the greatest leverage — never as a forced template, never driven by margin.
We design, govern and operate end-to-end architectures for international organisations that demand more than software. ERP-agnostic. Finance-first. Execution-led. Seven specialised business units, one delivery standard.
JPS-iQ is a certified partner on the platforms that matter — NetSuite, Microsoft, SAP, Zoho, Xentral. Individual platform logos live on the BU pages. At group level, what counts is what the group as a whole carries.
We exist for organisations where ERP, finance, operations and governance can no longer be treated as separate workstreams. Three principles hold the group together — and make it the partner for programmes that have to carry beyond the next module list.
NetSuite, Microsoft, SAP, Zoho, Xentral and adjacent systems are used where they have the greatest leverage — never as a forced template, never driven by margin.
Every programme starts with the numbers logic: chart of accounts, multibook, taxes, intercompany, reporting and finance handover — before the first module goes live.
Architecture, governance and operations are connected through one accountable delivery line — from blueprint to the running platform. No handoff into a delivery pool.
Five platform-focused business units for ERP and adjacent systems, plus two own services for execution and finance operations. Each unit with its own depth, all sharing the same governance, finance discipline and delivery standard.
The group's flagship business unit. SuiteSuccess-conformant where the standard holds — an own Manufacturing Blueprint in SAP-grade depth where it needs to go further. Retail, services, manufacturing.
MicrosoftF&O recovery, Business Central growth, Modern Workspace integration. Microsoft as a controllable platform — not a toolbox with open seams.
SAPS/4HANA advisory with finance, controlling and governance at the core. Selective engagements where SAP has to hold under real operational pressure.
ZohoFinance, CRM, operations and automation as one platform — for fast, structured digitalisation in growing organisations.
XentralCommerce, fulfilment and finance in one system. For DTC brands, marketplace-native merchants and international commerce expansion — instead of parallel single tools.
OPCON by JPS-iQERP evaluation, business analysis, programme execution and stabilisation — end-to-end across the ERP lifecycle, platform-agnostic, finance-aware.
BPO by JPS-iQFinance-first managed operations, system-close execution, scalable shared services across entities and regions — not a detached outsourcing layer.
Most ERP and transformation programmes fail at the seams between strategy, technology and execution. Our model treats those three layers as one accountable architecture — not as three separate workstreams meeting each other for the first time at go-live.
Finance architecture, target processes, platform choice and governance are decided on one line — not in three silos that meet for the first time at kickoff.
NetSuite, Microsoft, SAP, Zoho or Xentral — implemented around real finance, operations and growth requirements. Integration as a first-class concern, not an afterthought.
Finance, back-office and shared-service operations run inside the same systems and governance. No second partner for running it, no seam friction.
ERP is on the agenda — but the answer is not yet on the table? We walk through the setup with you honestly, without a platform pitch, without lock-in.
Book a 30-minute executive sparring callWhichever ERP platform is chosen: a company's economic truth must not live in several tools in parallel. In every engagement, JPS-iQ builds a clear system of record — one data model, one finance logic, a clean handover into the books. That is the discipline that separates a software rollout from a transformation programme.
Not every advisory house brings ERP depth. Not every reseller brings finance discipline. Not every consultancy stays into operations. The combination is what makes JPS-iQ the partner for programmes that have to keep carrying after go-live.
We say no to NetSuite, Microsoft, SAP or Xentral when another system fits the operation better. The platform decision lands at the end of the assessment — not before the first call. That requires genuine depth in several platforms, and we have it inside the group.
Chart of accounts, multibook, intercompany, taxes, period-close discipline and investor-grade reporting are not workstream three — they are the foundation on which the platform is built. Finance handover from day one, not as a retrofit at the first quarterly close.
Senior-led engagements with one accountability line from blueprint into live operations. No handoff from a sales team into an anonymous delivery pool. The person who owns the architecture stays in the programme until it holds.
Five platform BUs, two own services, one delivery standard. When Xentral hits a limit in later growth, when NetSuite needs manufacturing depth, when BPO needs to carry the monthly close — the next step sits inside the same group. No third consultancy, no new learning curve.
Six capability themes that show up in every programme — independent of the platform chosen. Not a module list, but the disciplines we own and are accountable for inside the group.
No blank-slate projects. No one-off chaos. No trial-and-error. A target model is on the table from day one — with a shorter timeline, less noise and better decision quality.
Chart of accounts, dimensions, intercompany, taxes and reporting structure for international environments.
Order-to-cash, procure-to-pay, revenue, projects and operations as one connected system.
Honest platform recommendation along the operation — NetSuite, Microsoft, SAP, Zoho or Xentral — rather than a default sale.
Programme governance, change control and rollout logic that keep international delivery consistent.
Finance-first operations inside the same platform and governance — monthly close, shared services, scalable across entities.
Multi-entity, multi-country, multi-currency and controlled extension logic — for growth that does not outrun the architecture.
Still in pre-selection — or already mid-programme and not carrying? We bring architectural clarity to what otherwise stays a module debate.
Request an assessment callEvery engagement runs through a defined lifecycle. Every phase has a clear outcome, clear accountability and a clear handover — so the programme does not outrun the architecture, and the architecture does not slow the programme down.
Operating model, finance architecture and system landscape on one page. Platform recommendation at the end — not at the start.
Finance blueprint, process architecture, platform design and rollout logic — before anything is built. No trial-and-error delivery.
Controlled build, planned cutover, hypercare in the first weeks. Exception handling and operating rhythm embedded.
OPCON for execution, BPO for finance operations — or a clean handover to the internal team. Evolution without re-implementation.
We invest where finance logic, operating model and platform architecture have to hold under real pressure. Four industry commitments where the group carries real depth — across platforms.
Revenue recognition, subscription logic, bundles, project business and investor-grade reporting — finance depth the standard rollout rarely brings.
Project business, resource steering, profitability, governance and clean period close in delivery-driven organisations.
Bills of material, routings, costing, planning and inventory — with defensible finance handover. Our NetSuite Manufacturing Blueprint is the reference case here.
Multi-channel commerce, fulfilment, marketplace logic and warehouse-close execution at volume. Xentral, NetSuite and Microsoft, depending on the scale path.
JPS-iQ is run as a working group, not as a brand layer on top of the business units. The founder runs the group. The Group COO keeps the operating model honest. The MD of the flagship NetSuite BU carries delivery responsibility for our most important product. The COO of the consulting BU owns execution where numbers meet the platform.
Founder · Group Managing Director
JPS-iQ Solutions Group · Tech IQ EMEA GmbH · Tech IQ Business Consulting GmbH
JPS-iQ was not built to sell software. It was built for the moment when leadership realises that ERP, finance and operations have to be one architecture — not three workstreams. That is where we sit at the table — and that is what the group stands for.
Group Chief Operating Officer
JPS-iQ Solutions Group
Operational excellence is not promised in the proposal — it is delivered in the lifecycle. Transition, steady state, reporting and handback have to come out of one operating cast across every business unit — on every engagement.
Managing Director · Group COO NetSuite Business Unit
Tech IQ EMEA GmbH · JPS-iQ Solutions Group
NetSuite is the group's flagship business unit and our most important product. My job is to make sure finance, industry and platform architecture hold together — and that every programme we run becomes a delivery standard the rest of the group can rely on.
Managing Director · COO Consulting Business Unit
Tech IQ Business Consulting GmbH · JPS-iQ Solutions Group
The consulting business unit is where execution actually lands — OPCON, BPO, platform work, recovery, operations. Our job is to keep that operating model end-to-end disciplined, so that architectural decisions turn into clean, repeatable delivery.
No marketing fluff. The questions boards, CFOs and COOs really ask before an advisory engagement — and the clear answers on how we work.
JPS-iQ is an advisory house for ERP, finance and operations with specialised business units: NetSuite as the flagship, Microsoft, SAP, Zoho and Xentral as platform-focused units, OPCON for execution and enablement, BPO for finance operations and shared services.
The group is ERP-agnostic, finance-first and execution-led — we design and operate the architecture in which ERP, finance and operations hold together. Geographically: EMEA and APAC, one delivery standard.
First — ERP-agnostic: we recommend the platform that fits the operation, not the one whose margin we defend. The platform choice lands at the end of the assessment, not in the first call.
Second — finance-first: chart of accounts, multibook, intercompany and reporting come before the first module. Finance handover from day one, not as a retrofit.
Third — into live operations: no handoff from a sales team to an anonymous delivery pool. Senior-led engagements with architectural ownership from blueprint into hypercare.
The platforms: NetSuite (flagship), Microsoft Dynamics 365 and Business Central, SAP S/4HANA, Zoho, Xentral. Plus our own services OPCON (execution & enablement) and BPO (finance operations).
Why multi-ERP: no single system fits every industry, every company size and every finance depth. NetSuite is strong in mid-market retail and services. SAP carries where manufacturing and regulatory depth decide. Xentral is the right answer for commerce volume up to the next growth stage. We take the decision along the reality — and we have the delivery depth inside the group, whichever platform is chosen.
A 30-minute call on the current state: operating model, finance architecture, system landscape, time window. No vendor pitch in the first meeting.
If the fit is there, a two-week assessment phase follows with a one-page target-architecture sketch. Only then do we talk about scope, commercials and rollout plan. The platform question is decided at that point — not before.
Assessment and target-architecture sketch are billed as a fixed-fee block. The actual implementation runs in phases with clear deliverables and fixed-fee or capacity models, depending on the programme profile. BPO operations are set up as ongoing service contracts.
No hidden licence kickbacks, no surprise module upsells. The commercial structure is put on the table transparently at the end of the assessment — before scope is locked.
Good fit: mid-market and enterprise with multi-entity, multi-country or finance-depth requirements, fast-growing commerce brands with operational complexity, and organisations that need to move from a stalled ERP programme back into a defensible target model.
Less of a fit: single-entity businesses with standard processes and minimal complexity looking for pure copy-paste delivery — there are cheaper partners for that. Likewise: companies primarily looking for a low-cost licence reseller. We say so early, before both sides lose time.
Whether you are evaluating a platform, rescuing a stalled programme, scaling across systems or rethinking your operating model: the group has the depth to shape the right end-to-end answer — and the accountability line to carry it into live operations.